LLM Security
Stress-test your LLM application before users and attackers do, with practical threat modeling and remediation guidance for real production systems.
Threat model for prompts, tools, retrieval, data boundaries, and user permissions
Prompt injection and data exfiltration test cases matched to your application
Remediation plan for guardrails, output validation, monitoring, and access controls
Scope
LLM security audits for AI applications covering prompt injection, data exfiltration, tool misuse, RAG poisoning, output validation, access control, and OWASP Top 10 for LLMs risks.
Prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, jailbreak paths, and instruction hierarchy
Tool calling permissions, agent action boundaries, and confused-deputy risks
RAG poisoning, retrieval leakage, source trust, and document-level authorization
Sensitive data exposure, logging, retention, and provider boundary review
Output validation, policy enforcement, abuse monitoring, and escalation paths
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs mapping and prioritized remediation
Scope the AI feature, users, permissions, tools, and data sources
Review prompts, retrieval, tool calls, logs, and security boundaries
Run targeted abuse and prompt injection tests
Deliver findings and help prioritize remediation
Risk Signals
Retrieval systems that expose documents without enforcing user authorization
Agents with tools that can act across tenant or privilege boundaries
Prompt injection protections that only rely on wording inside the system prompt
Logs or traces that quietly retain sensitive user or business data
Short answers before the discovery call.
Yes. OWASP Top 10 for LLMs is used as a practical reference, but the review is adapted to the actual architecture, data flows, and threat model.
Yes. Tool-calling and agent workflows are a core part of the review because they create the highest-impact failure modes.
The output is a security findings report with reproduction notes, risk ranking, and remediation guidance. It can be shaped for internal security review or engineering execution.
Useful next pages if you are comparing scope.
