LLM Security Audit & Threat Modeling
Stress-test your LLM application before users and attackers do, with practical threat modeling and remediation guidance for real production systems.
Threat model for prompts, tools, retrieval, data boundaries, and user permissions
Prompt injection and data exfiltration test cases matched to your application
Remediation plan for guardrails, output validation, monitoring, and access controls
What the LLM security audit covers
LLM security audit for AI applications and agents: test prompt injection, data access and tool permissions. Get a threat model and practical remediation guidance.
Prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, jailbreak paths, and instruction hierarchy
Tool calling permissions, agent action boundaries, and confused-deputy risks
RAG poisoning, retrieval leakage, source trust, and document-level authorization
Sensitive data exposure, logging, retention, and provider boundary review
Output validation, policy enforcement, abuse monitoring, and escalation paths
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs mapping and prioritized remediation
Deliverables
- LLM threat model
- Security findings report
- Prompt injection test plan
- Remediation roadmap
Engagement Flow
-
1
Scope the AI feature, users, permissions, tools, and data sources
-
2
Review prompts, retrieval, tool calls, logs, and security boundaries
-
3
Run targeted abuse and prompt injection tests
-
4
Deliver findings and help prioritize remediation
Common LLM security problems
Retrieval systems that expose documents without enforcing user authorization
Agents with tools that can act across tenant or privilege boundaries
Prompt injection protections that only rely on wording inside the system prompt
Logs or traces that quietly retain sensitive user or business data
Questions Teams Ask
Short answers before the initial consultation.
Do you follow OWASP Top 10 for LLMs?
Yes. OWASP Top 10 for LLMs is used as a practical reference, but the review is adapted to the actual architecture, data flows, and threat model.
Can you test agentic systems?
Yes. Tool-calling and agent workflows are a core part of the review because they create the highest-impact failure modes.
Will this produce a penetration-test style report?
The output is a security findings report with reproduction notes, risk ranking, and remediation guidance. It can be shaped for internal security review or engineering execution.
Related Services
Useful next pages if you are comparing scope.